Philosophical methodology and strikes

Journal of Clinical Ethics 2 (1):16-17 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

...how do we train residents to employ ethical reasoning? This is a good question, not only for the problem of strikes, but also for all medical training. The best method is inductive, since that most closely parallels the clinical reasoning processes that define the reality of medical practice. The strengths of inductive reasoning are that it most closely matches the realities of practice, it arises from the particular circumstances of the case, and it leads to a casuistic conclusion that applies more directly than abstract reasoning models to the problem at hand. The weaknesses, though, require that inductive models include a check and balance

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Induction.Rafal Urbaniak & Diderik Batens - 2012 - In Sven Ove Hansson & Vincent F. Hendricks (eds.), Introduction to Formal Philosophy. Cham: Springer. pp. 105-130.
Inductive reasoning, deductive reasoning and mental models.Stephen E. Newstead - 1994 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 8 (1):65 – 67.
Value of wrong responses in inductive reasoning.J. J. B. Morgan - 1945 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 35 (2):141.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-02

Downloads
25 (#150,191)

6 months
7 (#1,397,300)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references