Enaction Without Hagiography [Book Review]

Constructivist Foundations 13 (1):41-44 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Vörös and Bitbol provide a helpful account of the depths of enaction but their hagiographic rhetoric and neglect of important historical facts and recent developments work at cross-purposes to their account.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Enacting Science: Extending Enaction Beyond the Content of a Theory.Ema Demšar - 2017 - Constructivist Foundations 13 (1):46-48.
Author's Response: Not Haiography but Ideational Biography: In Defense of Existential Enaction.Sebastjan Vörös & Michel Bitbol - 2017 - Constructivist Foundations 13 (1):52-58.
Interactivity Should Aim to Extend, Not Reject, the Conceptual Foundations of Enaction.T. Froese - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):247-249.
Enaction: An Incomplete Paradigm for Consciousness Science. Review of “Enaction: Toward a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science” edited by John Stewart, Olivier Gapenne and Ezequiel A. Di Paolo.D. A. Reid - 2011 - Constructivist Foundations 7 (1):81-83.
Enaction, and Its Relation to Science in an Objective Key.F. Cummins - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):245-246.
Enacting Enaction: Conceptual Nest or Existential Mutation?S. Vörös - 2017 - Constructivist Foundations 12 (2):148-150.
Empathy, enaction, and shared musical experience.Joel Krueger - 2013 - In Tom Cochrane, Bernardino Fantini & Klaus Scherer (eds.), The Emotional Power of Music: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Musical Expression, Arousal and Social Control. Oxford University Press. pp. 177-196.
Enacting Enaction: A Dialectic Between Knowing and Being.Sebastjan Vörös & Michel Bitbol - 2017 - Constructivist Foundations 13 (1):31-40.
Action, connectionism and enaction: A developmental perspective. [REVIEW]Julie C. Rutkowska - 1990 - AI and Society 4 (2):96-114.
What Is at Stake in the Disagreement Between Interactivity and Enaction?N. F. Barrett - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):249-251.
Enaction-based artificial intelligence: Toward co-evolution with humans in the loop. [REVIEW]Pierre De Loor, Kristen Manac’H. & Jacques Tisseau - 2009 - Minds and Machines 19 (3):319-343.
Francisco Varela and Immune System Modeling, Closure, Cognition and Enaction. [REVIEW]Irun R. Cohen - 2017 - Constructivist Foundations 13 (1):151-154.
Enaction: Toward a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science.John Stewart, Olivier Gapenne & Ezequiel A. Di Paolo (eds.) - 2010 - Bradford.
Deleuze and the Enaction of Nonsense.William Short, Alistair Welchman & Wilson Shearin - 2014 - In Tom Froese & Massimiliano Cappuccio (eds.), Enactive Cognition at the Edge of Sense-Making. pp. 238-265.
Rule-Following, Meaning Constitution and Enaction.Patrizio Lo Presti - 2015 - Human Affairs 25 (1):110-120.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-02-10

Downloads
19 (#794,881)

6 months
1 (#1,461,875)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Evan Thompson
University of British Columbia

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references