A note on naive set theory in ${\rm LP}$

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 33 (3):422-432 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,829

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Naïve set theory is innocent!A. Weir - 1998 - Mind 107 (428):763-798.
The Simple Consistency of Naive Set Theory using Metavaluations.Ross T. Brady - 2014 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 43 (2-3):261-281.
Routes to triviality.Susan Rogerson & Greg Restall - 2004 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 33 (4):421-436.
The undecidability of grisin's set theory.Andrea Cantini - 2003 - Studia Logica 74 (3):345 - 368.
Naive physics.Barry Smith & Roberto Casati - 1994 - Philosophical Psychology 7 (2):227 – 247.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
57 (#280,725)

6 months
15 (#166,852)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Greg Restall
University of Melbourne

Citations of this work

Impossible Worlds: A Modest Approach.Daniel Nolan - 1997 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 38 (4):535-572.
Dialetheism.Francesco Berto, Graham Priest & Zach Weber - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 2018 (2018).
Theism and Dialetheism.A. J. Cotnoir - 2018 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96 (3):592-609.
Assertion, denial and non-classical theories.Greg Restall - 2013 - In Francesco Berto, Edwin Mares, Koji Tanaka & Francesco Paoli (eds.), Paraconsistency: Logic and Applications. Springer. pp. 81--99.
Transfinite numbers in paraconsistent set theory.Zach Weber - 2010 - Review of Symbolic Logic 3 (1):71-92.

View all 28 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The logic of paradox.Graham Priest - 1979 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 (1):219 - 241.
Minimally inconsistent LP.Graham Priest - 1991 - Studia Logica 50 (2):321 - 331.
The simple consistency of a set theory based on the logic ${\rm CSQ}$.Ross T. Brady - 1983 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 24 (4):431-449.
Inconsistent models for relevant arithmetics.Robert Meyer & Chris Mortensen - 1984 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 49 (3):917-929.

Add more references