Aesthetics and Film

Continuum (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

explanation is of course that Arnheim was working against the assumption that film cannot be art because it is mere mechanical recording. Thus what he needed to emphasize were all the ways in which film fails to accurately reproduce reality.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The literary origins of the cinematic narrator.Katherine Thomson-Jones - 2007 - British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (1):76-94.
Opera, ideology, and film.Jeremy Tambling - 1987 - New York: St. Martin's Press.
What do we see in film?Robert Hopkins - 2008 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 66 (2):149–159.
The Philosophy of Film: Introductory Texts and Readings.K. Thomson-Jones - 2006 - British Journal of Aesthetics 46 (2):210-212.
Narration in Motion.K. J. Thomson-Jones - 2012 - British Journal of Aesthetics 52 (1):33-43.
Philosophy, Black Film, Film Noir by flory, dan.Stephanie Patridge - 2011 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 69 (2):242-244.
The illusion of realism in film.Andrew Kania - 2002 - British Journal of Aesthetics 42 (3):243-258.
Cinematic narrators.Katherine Thomson-Jones - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (2):296-311.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-05-23

Downloads
52 (#305,270)

6 months
6 (#510,793)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

How Not to Defend Response Moralism.Aaron Smuts - 2015 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 49 (4):19-38.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references