The United States and the UN's Targeted Sanctions of Suspected Terrorists: What Role for Human Rights?

Ethics and International Affairs 24 (2):131-142 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The UN Security Council's approach to counterterrorism, which the United States has greatly shaped, has generally shown a marked human rights deficit. The process for seizing the assets of and imposing travel bans on suspected terrorists and their financiers must be reformed.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,435

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Human Rights Council: A New Era in UN Human Rights Work?Yvonne Terlingen - 2007 - Ethics and International Affairs 21 (2):167-178.
Crossing a Moral Line: Long-Term Preventive Detention in the War on Terror.Alec Walen - 2008 - Philosophy and Public Policy Quarterly 28 (3/4):15-21.
Continuing the conversation on chinese human rights.Roger T. Ames - 1997 - Ethics and International Affairs 11:177–205.
International human rights and national discretion.Burleigh Wilkins - 2002 - The Journal of Ethics 6 (4):373-382.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-07-02

Downloads
30 (#525,754)

6 months
3 (#981,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references