The aesthetic turn

Approaching Religion 6 (2):6-13 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper considers alternative styles of philosophy, based on art or science, through an investigation of Rudolf Carnap and Martin Heidegger. Carnap’s criticism of Heidegger’s account of das Nichts is analysed in relation to Immanuel Kant’s theory of the imagination. Heidegger’s account of the work of art demonstrates philosophies that take science as their model, over-emphasize cognition, and do not adequately consider the importance of apprehension.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,592

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Imagination in Kant and Fichte, and Some Reflections on Heidegger’s Interpretation.George J. Seidel - 2016 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 21 (2):213-223.
The Phenomenological Kant: Heidegger's Interest in Transcendental Philosophy.Chad Engelland - 2010 - Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 41 (2):150-169.
Imagination as Groundless Ground.Duane Armitage - 2016 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (2):477-496.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-06-08

Downloads
8 (#1,310,468)

6 months
1 (#1,469,469)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Elimination of Metaphysics Through Logical Analysis of Language.Rudolf Carnap - 1961 - In Alfred Jules Ayer (ed.), Logical positivism. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press. pp. 60-81.

Add more references