Are humans superior to animals and plants?

Environmental Ethics 6 (2):149-160 (1984)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Louis G. Lombardi’s arguments in support of the claim that humans have greater inherent worth than other living things provide a clear account of how it is possible to conceive of the relation between humans and nonhumans in this way. Upon examining his arguments, however, it seems that he does not succeed in establishing any reason to believe that humans actually do have greater inherent worth than animals and plants

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Are Humans Superior to Animals and Plants?Paul W. Taylor - 1984 - Environmental Ethics 6 (2):149-160.
Towards a new ethics for bioculture.F. Manti - 2015 - Global Bioethics 26 (3-4):177-189.
Inherent Worth, Respect, and Rights.Louis G. Lombardi - 1983 - Environmental Ethics 5 (3):257-270.
Inherent worth, respect, and rights.Louis G. Lombardi - 1983 - Environmental Ethics 5 (3):257-270.
Biomedical Testing on Nonhuman Animals.Alan C. Clune - 1996 - The Monist 79 (2):230-246.
A Cartesian Approach to Environmental Ethics.Ryan Garrett - 2018 - Environmental Ethics 40 (3):261-268.
On justifying the exploitation of animals in research.S. F. Sapontzis - 1988 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 13 (2):177-196.
Direct Moral Standing and Regan's Lifeboat Cases.Daniel Austin Kary - 2018 - Dissertation, University of Calgary

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
275 (#77,273)

6 months
15 (#185,276)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references