The Morality of Hunting: "A Damnable Pleasure"

Dissertation, Cornell University (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue that hunting pursued for its own sake is morally justifiable. My focus is on recreational or sport hunting, defined as hunting motivated not by need or utility, but by a desire for pleasure or enjoyment. As a form of recreation, hunting is fundamentally and essentially a form of play. ;Moral debate about sport hunting goes back well over two thousand years. I examine the anti-hunting and animal rights movements on historical, sociological, and philosophical levels. Modern animal advocates employ an analogy to racism and sexism in the term, "speciesism." I conclude that the sound arguments against human racism and sexism are not sound when extended to nonhuman species differences. I review the conceptual, philosophical, and ethological issues that surround the idea of animal suffering, and I argue that animal sympathizers often make mistaken anthropomorphic attributions about animal behavior and animal mentality. I also draw from the philosophy of mind to examine how the question of animal self-consciousness might affect the moral questions surrounding our treatment of nonhuman animals. ;Many defenses of hunting, including prudential, utilitarian, ecological, and primitivist approaches, may correctly diagnose the fundamental moral problem involved, which I take to be the killing of animals for pleasure, but as a group generally fail to defend hunting on this basis. Situating the values of hunting in the context of an Aristotelian virtue ethic, I argue that sport hunting contributes heavily to the eudaimonia of hunters and is an activity especially well suited for promoting a range of crucial intellectual and emotional virtues. Employing Aristotelian and literary insights about tragedy, I develop the idea of hunting as a tragic art that yields both pleasure and knowledge. Reflective sport hunters develop a realistic awareness of death and experience a type of tragic pleasure in the hunt that yields tragic wisdom, an important moral virtue. ;Finally, utilizing insights from classical liberal political theory, I propose a rationale for allowing hunting that should guide government policy for the foreseeable future

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Sport Hunting, Eudaimonia, and Tragic Wisdom.James A. Tantillo - 2001 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 8 (2):101-112.
On the Morality of Hunting.Ann S. Causey - 1989 - Environmental Ethics 11 (4):327-343.
A Moral Defense of Trophy Hunting and Why It Fails.S. P. Morris - 2021 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 15 (3):386-399.
On the morality of hunting.Ann S. Causey - 1989 - Environmental Ethics 11 (4):327-343.
Hunting as a Moral Good.Lawrence Cahoone - 2009 - Environmental Values 18 (1):67 - 89.
But They Can't Shoot Back.Theodore R. Vitali - 2010-09-24 - In Fritz Allhoff & Nathan Kowalsky (eds.), Hunting Philosophy for Everyone. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 23–32.
A Moral Defense of Trophy Hunting.Timothy Hsiao - 2018 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 14 (1):26-34.
Environmental Ethics and the Case for Hunting.Roger J. H. King - 1991 - Environmental Ethics 13 (1):59-85.
The moral basis for public policy encouraging sport hunting.Margaret Van de Pitte - 2003 - Journal of Social Philosophy 34 (2):256–266.
On the Moral Distinctiveness of Sport Hunting.Charles J. List - 2004 - Environmental Ethics 26 (2):155-169.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-04

Downloads
1 (#1,722,932)

6 months
1 (#1,912,481)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references