Environmental Ethics 11 (4):327-343 (1989)
AbstractThe controversy between hunting apologists and their anti-hunting antagonists continues to escalate. Numerous attempts to settle the issue have failed in part because the participants have often not distinguished and treated separately the various activities labeled “hunting.” Those who participate in hunting fall into one of two categories: shooters or sport hunters. Shooters are those whose ultimate goals do not depend on hunting but can be met in other ways; sport hunters are those who take immense pleasure in the hunt itself and who kill in order to have had an authentic hunting experience. Discussion of the morality of hunting (as opposed to its prudence) is properly restricted to the moral evaluation of the desire of sport hunters to kill for pleasure. This desire can be explained by biological/evolutionary concepts and defended as morally neutral. Neither the animal protectionists nor the utilitarian apologists recognize that violent death is part of nature and that man’s desire to participate in it can be both natural and culturally valuable. Though well-intentioned, utilitarianism is an impotent ethical defense of hunting because it can judge only the prudence, not the morality, of hunting
Similar books and articles
Is Hunting a “Sport”?John Alan Cohan - 2003 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 17 (2):291-326.
Contemplating the Interests of Fish: The Angler’s Challenge.A. Dionys de Leeuw - 1996 - Environmental Ethics 18 (4):373-390.
On the Moral Significance of a Hunting Ethic.Charles J. List - 1998 - Ethics and the Environment 3 (2):157 - 175.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Violent Love: Hunting, Heterosexuality, and the Erotics of Men's Predation.Brian Luke - 1998 - Feminist Studies 24 (3):627.
Environmental Ethics and Trophy Hunting.Alastair S. Gunn - 2001 - Ethics and the Environment 6 (1):68-95.
Animal Liberationism, Ecocentrism, and the Morality of Sport Hunting.Maurice L. Wade - 1990 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 17 (1):15-27.
How to Argue for and Against Sport Hunting.Jordan Curnutt - 1996 - Journal of Social Philosophy 27 (2):65-89.
References found in this work
No references found.