In Steven Michael Emmanuel (ed.), Blackwell Companion to Buddhist Philosophy. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 320-330 (2013)

Authors
Koji Tanaka
Australian National University
Abstract
Logic in Buddhist Philosophy concerns the systematic study of anumāna (often translated as inference) as developed by Dignāga (480-540 c.e.) and Dharmakīti (600-660 c.e.). Buddhist logicians think of inference as an instrument of knowledge (pramāṇa) and, thus, logic is considered to constitute part of epistemology in the Buddhist tradition. According to the prevalent 20th and early 21st century ‘Western’ conception of logic, however, logical study is the formal study of arguments. If we understand the nature of logic to be formal, it is difficult to see what bearing logic has on knowledge. In this paper, by weaving together the main threads of thought that are salient in Dignāga’s and Dharmakīti’s texts, I shall re-conceive the nature of logic in the context of epistemology and demarcate the logical part of epistemology which can be recognised as logic. I shall demonstrate that we can recognise the logical significance of inference as understood by Buddhist logicians despite the fact that its logical significance lies within the context of knowledge.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on Amazon.com
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Change in View.Gilbert Harman - 1986 - Behaviorism 16 (1):93-96.
.Gilbert Harman - 2008 - Cambridge University Press.
What The Tortoise Said To Achilles.Lewis Carroll - 1895 - Mind 104 (416):691-693.
Paraconsistent Logic.Graham Priest - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 25 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Buddhist Idealism.Bronwyn Finnigan - 2017 - In Tyron Goldschmidt & Kenneth Pearce (eds.), Idealism: New Essays in Metaphysics. Oxford University Press. pp. 178-199.
Buddhist Logic From a Global Perspective.Koji Tanaka - 2021 - In Inkeri Koskinen, David Ludwig, Zinhle Mncube, Luana Poliseli & Luis Reyes-Galindo (eds.), Global Epistemologies and Philosophies of Science. London: Routledge. pp. 274-285.
Buddhist Logic.Koji Tanaka - forthcoming - Routledge Encyclopaedia of Philosophy.
How Can Buddhists Prove That Non-Existent Things Do Not Exist?Koji Tanaka - 2021 - In Sara Bernstein & Tyron Goldschmidt (eds.), Non-Being: New Essay on the Metaphysics of Non-Existence. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. pp. 82-96.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Buddhist Epistemology.S. R. Bhatt - 2000 - Greenwood Press.
The Moon Points Back.Koji Tanaka, Yasuo Deguchi, Jay Garfield & Graham Priest (eds.) - 2015 - Oxford University Press USA.
Buddhist Idealism.Bronwyn Finnigan - 2017 - In Tyron Goldschmidt & Kenneth Pearce (eds.), Idealism: New Essays in Metaphysics. Oxford University Press. pp. 178-199.
Buddhist Epistemology: The Study of Pramana.Jonathan Stoltz - 2009 - Religion Compass 3 (4):537-548.
Buddhist Formal Logic.R. S. Y. Chi - 1969 - Motilal Banarsidass.
Western Studies in Indian Buddhist Logic-Epistemology.Yuguang Liu - 1998 - Philosophy and Culture 25 (12):1160-1173.
The Logic of the Catuskoti.Graham Priest - 2010 - Comparative Philosophy 1 (2):24-54.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-09-12

Total views
3,214 ( #1,081 of 2,498,759 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
542 ( #703 of 2,498,759 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes