What The Tortoise Said To Achilles

Mind 104 (416):691-693 (1895)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

1995

DOI

10.1093/mind/104.416.691

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

'What the Tortoise said to Achilles': Lewis Carroll's Paradox of Inference.Amirouche Moktefi & Francine F. Abeles (eds.) - 2016 - London: The Lewis Carroll Society.
Paradoxes and FTL Communication.John Cramer - unknown
Why Achilles Need Not Catch the Tortoise.Takuo Aoyama - 2010 - Kagaku Tetsugaku 43 (2):81-94.
A discrete solution for the paradox of Achilles and the tortoise.Vincent Ardourel - 2015 - Synthese 192 (9):2843-2861.
What the Tortoise Said to Achilles.Jon Pérez Laraudogoitia - 2014 - Philosophia 42 (2):405-411.
What the tortoise said to Achilles.Lewis Carroll - 1895 - Mind 4 (14):278-280.
Paradoxes 2: Achilles and the Tortoise: Clark Paradoxes.Michael Clark - 2002 - Think 1 (2):95-98.
Achilles und die Schildkröte.Gregor Betz - 2012 - In Georg Bertram (ed.), Philosophische Gedankenexperimente – ein Lese- und Studienbuch. Reclam.
What's Wrong with Zeno.Andrew Wutke - manuscript
The Virtuous Tortoise.David Botting - 2015 - Philosophical Investigations 40 (1):31-39.
The Virtuous Tortoise.David Botting - 2016 - Philosophical Investigations 39 (4).
What Achilles Did and the Tortoise Wouldn't.Catherine Legg - manuscript
Achilles, the Tortoise, and Colliding Balls.Jeanne Peijnenburg & David Atkinson - 2008 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 25 (3):187 - 201.
Achilles and the Tortoise.Max Black - 1970 - In Wesley Charles Salmon (ed.), Zeno’s Paradoxes. Indianapolis, IN, USA: Bobbs-Merrill. pp. 67-81.
Achilles and the Tortoise.Max Black - 1950 - Analysis 11 (5):91.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-19

Downloads
51 (#306,042)

6 months
12 (#202,587)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Ethics of Conceptualization: A Needs-Based Approach.Matthieu Queloz - forthcoming - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Why be rational.Niko Kolodny - 2005 - Mind 114 (455):509-563.
What is inference?Paul Boghossian - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 169 (1):1-18.
Ground grounded.Theodore Sider - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (3):747-767.
What is Reasoning?Conor McHugh & Jonathan Way - 2018 - Mind 127 (505):167-196.

View all 348 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references