- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Uncertainty of, and stakeholder response to, emerging technologies: food nanotechnology in Japan
Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 12 (2):113-122 (2012)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Nanotechnology, uncertainty and regulation. A guest editorial.Simone Arnaldi & Alessia Muratorio - 2013 - NanoEthics 7 (3):173-175.
Integration needs in assessments of nanotechnology in food and agriculture.Ellen-Marie Forsberg & Carolien De Lauwere - 2013 - Etikk I Praksis - Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics 1 (1):38-54.
Nanotechnology applied to European food production – A review of ethical and regulatory issues.David Coles & L. J. Frewer - unknown
Food Ethics.David M. Kaplan - 2012 - In Jan Kyrre Berg Olsen Friis, Stig Andur Pedersen & Vincent F. Hendricks (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Technology. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 439–441.
Risk and Precaution.Fritz Allhoff, Patrick Lin & Daniel Moore - 2009 - In Fritz Allhoff, Patrick Lin & Daniel Moore (eds.), What is Nanotechnology and Why Does It Matter: From Science to Ethics. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 71–95.
Deliberating risks under uncertainty: Experience, trust, and attitudes in a swiss nanotechnology stakeholder discussion group.Regula Valérie Burri - 2007 - NanoEthics 1 (2):143-154.
Governing with Ignorance: Understanding the Australian Food Regulator’s Response to Nano Food.Kristen Lyons & Naomi Smith - 2017 - NanoEthics 12 (1):27-38.
Environment.Fritz Allhoff, Patrick Lin & Daniel Moore - 2009 - In Fritz Allhoff, Patrick Lin & Daniel Moore (eds.), What is Nanotechnology and Why Does It Matter: From Science to Ethics. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 151–169.
Is There Room at the Bottom for CSR? Corporate Social Responsibility and Nanotechnology in the UK.Chris Groves, Lori Frater, Robert Lee & Elen Stokes - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 101 (4):525-552.
Analytics
Added to PP
2012-02-29
Downloads
21 (#728,521)
6 months
3 (#1,207,210)
2012-02-29
Downloads
21 (#728,521)
6 months
3 (#1,207,210)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The ethical and social imperatives of dialogue for public engagement in technoscience: trends in AsiaPacific governance.Tomiko Yamaguchi, Karen Cronin & Darryl Macer - 2012 - Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 12 (2):63-65.
References found in this work
States of knowledge: the co-production of science and social order.Sheila Jasanoff (ed.) - 2004 - New York: Routledge.
The idiom of co-operation.S. Jasanoff - 2004 - In Sheila Jasanoff (ed.), States of knowledge: the co-production of science and social order. New York: Routledge. pp. 1--12.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-ktvwr uwo