Is there Such a Thing as a Good Profit? Taking Conventional Ethics Seriously

Philosophia 49 (4):1725-1751 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper will show that if we take conventional ethics seriously, then there is no moral justification for business profits. To show this, we explore three conventional ethical theories, namely Christian ethics, Kantian ethics and Utilitarian ethics. Since they essentially reject self-interest, they also reject the essence of business: the profit motive. To illustrate the relationship, we will concretize how the anti-egoist perspective expresses itself in business and business ethics. In business, we look at what many businesses regard as proof of their virtue. In business ethics, we look at what many business ethicists say about the relationship between morality and self-interest and, thus, the profit motive. Ultimately, we will argue that conventional ethics can, at most, only justify the means of business, but not the end of business.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Ethics of Profit and the Profit of Ethics in Business.Odumayak Okpo - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 5:57-62.
Virtue Ethics, Aesthetics, and Reflective Practices in Business.John Dobson - 2022 - Philosophy of Management 21 (4):493-505.
Marketing Ethics: The Bottom Line?Michael Yeo - 1988 - Journal of Business Ethics 7 (12):929 - 932.
Self-interest, ethics, and the profit motive.B. Hooker - 1998 - In Roger Crisp & Christopher Cowton (eds.), Business ethics: perspectives on the practice of theory. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 27--41.
Business Ethics – Deontologically Revisited.Edwin R. Micewski & Carmelita Troy - 2007 - Journal of Business Ethics 72 (1):17-25.
After Business Ethics.Claus Dierksmeier - 2024 - Journal of Human Values 30 (1):52-58.
Why Worry about Business Ethics?R. E. Ewin - 1992 - Perth and Melbourne: Institute of Public Affairs.
Profit maximization: the ethical mandate of business.Patrick Primeaux - 1995 - San Francisco: Austin & Winfield. Edited by John Stieber.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-02-08

Downloads
18 (#859,297)

6 months
6 (#588,512)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals.Immanuel Kant - 1785 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Thomas E. Hill & Arnulf Zweig.
Nicomachean ethics. Aristotle - 1999 - New York: Clarendon Press. Edited by Michael Pakaluk. Translated by Michael Pakaluk.
Famine, Affluence, and Morality.Peter Singer - 1972 - Oxford University Press USA.
Utilitarianism.J. S. Mill - 1861 - Oxford University Press UK. Edited by Roger Crisp.
Critique of Practical Reason.Immanuel Kant (ed.) - 1788 - New York,: Hackett Publishing Company.

View all 62 references / Add more references