The Bounds of Reference: An Enquiry Into the Contingent a Priori and Descriptive Names

Dissertation, Rutgers the State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This dissertation is a defense of Kripke's contention that the reference of a name can be established via a reference-fixing description as well as via ostension. ;Descriptive names and similar devices give rise to contingent truths that can apparently be known a priori; the idea of a truth that is both contingent and a priori appears to be somewhat paradoxical. For example: It seems that simply stipulating that 'one meter' is to name the length of stick S enables one to know a priori a mind- and language-independent fact---the fact that the length of stick S is one meter---that one previously could only have known a posteriori. How can a trivial stipulation give one a priori access to extralinguistic reality? If one knows a proposition a priori, then one knows it without experience of the world. It should hence be true however the world happens to be, that is, true in any possible world, and so a necessary truth. ;I offer solutions to these paradoxes. My solution to claims that the stipulator and others knew that the length of stick S is one meter before the stipulation is made. This knowledge, however, is implicit. I argue that implicit knowledge is far more widespread than has been previously supposed. ;My solution to is offered in the second part of the dissertation, which consists of the development of a novel theory of concepts, the parasitic theory. I critically examine rival theories, suggesting that the phenomenon of descriptive reference raises hitherto unappreciated problems for these rival theories. The most important conclusions of my discussion are as follows: The parasitic theory challenges the assumption that a token intentional state realizes a unique thought that has a unique decomposition into its conceptual constituents. The parasitic theory allows that a token intentional state can be, and generally is, an instance of many thought types with differing conceptual constituents. The parasitic theory provides an account of conceptual truth. Concepts turn out to be world-bound on the parasitic theory; certain concepts can only be possessed in a restricted range of possible worlds

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The contingent a priori and implicit knowledge.Jonathan Supon - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (2):251–277.
The Contingent A Priori and Implicit Knowledge.Jonathan Sutton - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (2):251-277.
The contingent a priori and implicit knowledge.Jonathan Sutton - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (2):251-277.
I_— _Robert Stalnaker.Robert Stalnaker - 2001 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 75 (1):141-156.
Names and Beliefs.Heimir Geirsson - 1988 - Dissertation, The University of Nebraska - Lincoln
On considering a possible world as actual.Thomas Baldwin - 2001 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 75 (1):157–174.
On Considering a Possible World as Actual.Robert Stalnaker & Thomas Baldwin - 2001 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 75:141-174.
Contingent a priori truths and performatives.Marco Ruffino - 2020 - Synthese 198 (S22):5593-5613.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-07

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references