Epicurus and the Singularity of Death: Defending Radical Epicureanism

New York: Bloomsbury Academic (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Epicurus's claim that "death is nothing to us" is defended. The usual concepts of harm, loss and suffering do not apply in the case of death. Immortality need not be bad. Epicurean prudence does not recommend suicide. Some issues in applied ethics are also discussed: the right to life, egoistic friendship, wills, and life insurance.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Death and other nothings.David B. Suits - 2012 - Philosophical Forum 43 (2):215-230.
Nothing in the Dark.James S. Taylor - 2009 - In Noël Carroll & Lester H. Hunt (eds.), Philosophy in the Twilight Zone. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 171–186.
"Life" and "Death". An Inquiry into Essential Meaning of These Phenomena.Andrii Leonov - 2021 - Actual Problems of Mind. Philosophy Journal 22 (22):108-136.
Epicureanism About Death and Immortality.John Martin Fischer - 2006 - The Journal of Ethics 10 (4):355-381.
Epicureanism About Death and Immortality.John Martin Fischer - 2006 - The Journal of Ethics 10 (4):355-381.
VIII—Epicurus on Pleasure, a Complete Life, and Death: A Defence.Alex Voorhoeve - 2018 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 118 (3):225-253.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-02-11

Downloads
29 (#135,560)

6 months
16 (#899,032)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David B. Suits
Rochester Institute of Technology

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references