Roles of moral philosophy in appropriated bioethics: A response to Baker and McCullough

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (1):65-67 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Strong arguments support the notion that much of modern bioethics is a result of appropriation rather than strict application of traditional moral philosophy. Nevertheless, it is important to recognize these sources and approaches associated with them, even when working with appropriated theories, since traditional ethical theory does and should influence modern bioethics.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How to appropriate appropriately: A comment on Baker and McCullough.Albert R. Jonsen - 2007 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (1):43-54.
Gert's moral theory and its application to bioethics cases.Carson Strong - 2006 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 16 (1):39-58.
Is bioethics applied ethics?Robert M. Veatch - 2007 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (1):1-2.
Casuistry: An Alternative or Complement to Principles?Albert R. Jonsen - 1995 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 5 (3):237-251.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
32 (#486,594)

6 months
4 (#1,004,582)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references