- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Altruistic punishment as an explanation of hunter-gatherer cooperation: How much has experimental economics achieved?
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (1):40-40 (2012)
Abstract
The discovery of the altruistic punishment mechanism as a replicable experimental result is a genuine achievement of behavioural economics. The hypothesis that cooperation in hunter-gatherer societies is sustained by altruistic punishment is a scientifically legitimate conjecture, but it must be tested against real-world observations. Guala's doubts about the evidential support for this hypothesis are well founded.Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Altruistic punishment: What field data can (and cannot) demonstrate.Nikos Nikiforakis - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (1):32 - 33.
Costs and benefits in hunter-gatherer punishment.Christopher Boehm - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (1):19-20.
Has punishment played a role in the evolution of cooperation? A critical review.Nicolas Baumard - 2010 - Mind and Society 9 (2):171-192.
Altruistic Punishment: The Golden Keystone of Human Cooperation and Social Stability?Peter Lewisch - 2020 - Analyse & Kritik 42 (2):255-284.
Altruistic cooperation during foraging by the Ache, and the evolved human predisposition to cooperate.Kim Hill - 2002 - Human Nature 13 (1):105-128.
Altruistic cooperation during foraging by the Ache, and the evolved human predisposition to cooperate.Kim Hill - 2002 - Human Nature 13 (1):105-128.
Reciprocity: Weak or strong? What punishment experiments do (and do not) demonstrate.Francesco Guala - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (1):1-15.
Reciprocity: Weak or strong? What punishment experiments do (and do not) demonstrate.Francesco Guala - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (1):1-15.
The restorative logic of punishment: Another argument in favor of weak selection.Nicolas Baumard & Francesco Guala - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (1):17.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-10-27
Downloads
22 (#733,109)
6 months
6 (#587,779)
2013-10-27
Downloads
22 (#733,109)
6 months
6 (#587,779)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
References found in this work
The Experimetrics of Public Goods: Inferring Motivations from Contributions. [REVIEW]Nicholas Bardsley & Peter G. Moffatt - 2007 - Theory and Decision 62 (2):161-193.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-kfj6z uwo