Fractals and artificial intelligence to decrypt ideography and understand the evolution of language

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e254 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Self-sufficient ideographies are rare because they are stifled by the issue of standardization. Similar issues arise with abstract art or drawings created by young children or great apes. We propose that mathematical indices and artificial intelligence can help us decode ideography, and if not to understand its meaning, at least to know that meaning exists.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,897

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ai: Its Nature and Future.Margaret A. Boden - 2016 - Oxford University Press UK.
Intelligence, Artificial and Otherwise.Paul Dumouchel - 2019 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 24 (2):241-258.
What’s Stopping Us Achieving AGI?Albert Efimov - 2023 - Philosophy Now 3 (155):20-24.
Fractals and Ravens.Keith McGreggor, Maithilee Kunda & Ashok Goel - 2014 - Artificial Intelligence 215:1-23.
Is intelligence an algorithm?Antonin Tuynman - 2018 - Washington, USA: IFF Books.
Computational semantics: an introduction to artificial intelligence and natural language comprehension.Eugene Charniak & Yorick Wilks (eds.) - 1976 - New York: distributors for the U.S.A. and Canada, Elsevier/North Holland.
Machine Ethics.Michael Anderson & Susan Leigh Anderson (eds.) - 2011 - Cambridge Univ. Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-10-03

Downloads
27 (#589,634)

6 months
22 (#122,739)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations