Confucian Skepticism about Workplace Rights

Business Ethics Quarterly 18 (1):67-83 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Confucian scholars express skepticism about rights. This skepticism is relevant to managers who face issues about the recognition of workplace rights in a Confucian culture. My essay examines the foundations of this skepticism, and the cogency of potential leading Western liberal responses to it. I conclude that Confucian skepticism is more formidable than liberals have recognized. I attempt to craft an argument that defuses Confucian skepticism about workplace rights while at the same time respecting the moral depth of Confucianism.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Confucian Ethics and Labor Rights.Tae Wan Kim - 2014 - Business Ethics Quarterly 24 (4):565-594.
Workplace Civility: A Confucian Approach.Tae Wan Kim & Alan Strudler - 2012 - Business Ethics Quarterly 22 (3):557-577.
Workplace Civility: A Confucian Approach.Tae Wan Kim & Alan Strudler - 2012 - Business Ethics Quarterly 22 (3):557-577.
Rival Confucian Rights: Left or Right Confucianism?May Sim - 2011 - International Philosophical Quarterly 51 (1):5-22.
Confucian Values and Human Rights.May Sim - 2013 - Review of Metaphysics 67 (1):3-27.
The Problem of Autonomy in Confucian Ethics.Yu-yu Liu - 2006 - Modern Philosophy 6:105-111.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
14 (#1,020,370)

6 months
270 (#8,866)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

The Politics of Stakeholder Theory.R. Edward Freeman - 1994 - Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (4):409-421.
Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality.Michael Walzer - 1983 - Journal of Business Ethics 4 (1):63-64.
Why We Should Reject S.Derek Parfit - 1984 - In Reasons and Persons. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.

View all 17 references / Add more references