- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Can Hooker's rule-consequentialist principle justify Ross's prima facie duties?
Mind 106 (424):751-758 (1997)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Could Ross’s Pluralist Deontology Solve the Conflicting Duties Problem?Cecilia Tohaneanu - forthcoming - Revue Roumaine de Philosophie 59.
The right and the good.William David Ross - 2002 - Oxford: Clarendon Press. Edited by Philip Stratton-Lake.
Are some prima facie duties more binding than others?Michael Robinson - 2010 - Utilitas 22 (1):26-32.
The Right and the Good. Some Problems in Ethics.W. D. Ross - 1930 - Oxford: Clarendon Press. Edited by Philip Stratton-Lake.
Patient-Physician Relationship: In Defence of W. D. Ross’s Prima Facie Duties.Awe Solomon Kolawole & Esan Oluwatobi David - 2022 - Bangladesh Journal of Bioethics 13 (3):35-43.
The Right and the Good.David Ross - 1930 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK. Edited by Philip Stratton-Lake.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
318 (#66,158)
6 months
20 (#173,630)
2009-01-28
Downloads
318 (#66,158)
6 months
20 (#173,630)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
From Pluralistic Normative Principles to Autonomous-Agent Rules.Beverley Townsend, Colin Paterson, T. T. Arvind, Gabriel Nemirovsky, Radu Calinescu, Ana Cavalcanti, Ibrahim Habli & Alan Thomas - 2022 - Minds and Machines 32 (4):683-715.
From Pluralistic Normative Principles to Autonomous-Agent Rules.Beverley Townsend, Colin Paterson, T. T. Arvind, Gabriel Nemirovsky, Radu Calinescu, Ana Cavalcanti, Ibrahim Habli & Alan Thomas - 2022 - Minds and Machines 1:1-33.
Multi-dimensional consequentialism and degrees of rightness.Vuko Andrić & Attila Tanyi - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (3):711-731.
Rightness, Parsimony, and Consequentialism: A Response to Peterson.Roger Crisp - 2016 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (1):39-47.
Accounting for Moral Conflicts.Thomas Schmidt - 2016 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (1):9-19.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-7g5mb uwo