Turing test, easy to pass; human mind, hard to understand

Abstract

Under general assumptions, the Turing test can be easily passed by an appropriate algorithm. I show that for any test satisfying several general conditions, we can construct an algorithm that can pass that test, hence, any operational definition is easy to fulfill. I suggest a test complementary to Turing's test, which will measure our understanding of the human mind. The Turing test is required to fix the operational specifications of the algorithm under test; under this constrain, the additional test simply consists in measuring the length of the algorithm.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Peeking behind the screen: The unsuspected power of the standard Turing test.Robert M. French - 2000 - Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 12 (3):331-340.
The status and future of the Turing test.James H. Moor - 2001 - Minds and Machines 11 (1):77-93.
Newell's list.Joseph Agassi - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):601-602.
The Turing test.B. Jack Copeland - 2000 - Minds and Machines 10 (4):519-539.
Who's afraid of the Turing test?Dale Jacquette - 1993 - Behavior and Philosophy 20 (2):63-74.
Turing test: 50 years later.Ayse Pinar Saygin, Ilyas Cicekli & Varol Akman - 2000 - Minds and Machines 10 (4):463-518.
Turing's two tests for intelligence.Susan G. Sterrett - 1999 - Minds and Machines 10 (4):541-559.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
54 (#294,356)

6 months
3 (#962,988)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Computing machinery and intelligence.Alan M. Turing - 1950 - Mind 59 (October):433-60.

Add more references