Computing machinery and intelligence

Mind 59 (October):433-60 (1950)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I propose to consider the question, "Can machines think?" This should begin with definitions of the meaning of the terms "machine" and "think." The definitions might be framed so as to reflect so far as possible the normal use of the words, but this attitude is dangerous, If the meaning of the words "machine" and "think" are to be found by examining how they are commonly used it is difficult to escape the conclusion that the meaning and the answer to the question, "Can machines think?" is to be sought in a statistical survey such as a Gallup poll. But this is absurd. Instead of attempting such a definition I shall replace the question by another, which is closely related to it and is expressed in relatively unambiguous words. The new form of the problem can be described in terms of a game which we call the 'imitation game." It is played with three people, a man (A), a woman (B), and an interrogator (C) who may be of either sex. The interrogator stays in a room apart front the other two. The object of the game for the interrogator is to determine which of the other two is the man and which is the woman. He knows them by labels X and Y, and at the end of the game he says either "X is A and Y is B" or "X is B and Y is A." The interrogator is allowed to put questions to A and B. We now ask the question, "What will happen when a machine takes the part of A in this game?" Will the interrogator decide wrongly as often when the game is played like this as he does when the game is played between a man and a woman? These questions replace our original, "Can machines think?".

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Turing's two tests for intelligence.Susan G. Sterrett - 1999 - Minds and Machines 10 (4):541-559.
Turing's rules for the imitation game.Gualtiero Piccinini - 2000 - Minds and Machines 10 (4):573-582.
Making the right identification in the Turing test.Saul Traiger - 2000 - Minds and Machines 10 (4):561-572.
The imitation game.Keith Gunderson - 1964 - Mind 73 (April):234-45.
Who's afraid of the Turing test?Dale Jacquette - 1993 - Behavior and Philosophy 20 (2):63-74.
Look who's moving the goal posts now.Larry Hauser - 2001 - Minds and Machines 11 (1):41-51.
Undecidability in the imitation game.Y. Sato & T. Ikegami - 2004 - Minds and Machines 14 (2):133-43.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
4,519 (#1,197)

6 months
663 (#1,680)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?