Linguistics and Philosophy 40 (5):519-547 (2017)

Authors
Ernie LePore
Rutgers University - New Brunswick
Una Stojnic
Princeton University
Abstract
Traditionally, pronouns are treated as ambiguous between bound and demonstrative uses. Bound uses are non-referential and function as bound variables, and demonstrative uses are referential and take as a semantic value their referent, an object picked out jointly by linguistic meaning and a further cue—an accompanying demonstration, an appropriate and adequately transparent speaker’s intention, or both. In this paper, we challenge tradition and argue that both demonstrative and bound pronouns are dependent on, and co-vary with, antecedent expressions. Moreover, the semantic value of a pronoun is never determined, even partly, by extra-linguistic cues; it is fixed, invariably and unambiguously, by features of its context of use governed entirely by linguistic rules. We exploit the mechanisms of Centering and Coherence theories to develop a precise and general meta-semantics for pronouns, according to which the semantic value of a pronoun is determined by what is at the center of attention in a coherent discourse. Since the notions of attention and coherence are, we argue, governed by linguistic rules, we can give a uniform analysis of pronoun resolution that covers bound, demonstrative, and even discourse bound readings. Just as the semantic value of the first-person pronoun ‘I’ is conventionally set by a particular feature of its context of use—namely, the speaker—so too, we will argue, the semantic values of other pronouns, including ‘he’, are conventionally set by particular features of the context of use.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10988-017-9207-x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Demonstratives: An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics and Epistemology of Demonstratives and Other Indexicals.David Kaplan - 1989 - In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes From Kaplan. Oxford University Press. pp. 481-563.
On Referring.Peter F. Strawson - 1950 - Mind 59 (235):320-344.

View all 36 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No Context, No Content, No Problem.Ethan Nowak - 2021 - Mind and Language 36 (2):189-220.
Semantics Without Semantic Content.Daniel W. Harris - forthcoming - Mind and Language.
Content in a Dynamic Context.Una Stojnić - 2019 - Noûs 53 (2):394-432.
We talk to people, not contexts.Daniel W. Harris - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (9):2713-2733.
Discourse and Method.Ethan Nowak & Eliot Michaelson - 2020 - Linguistics and Philosophy 43 (2):119-138.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Essentially Indexical Bound Anaphoric Pronouns.Katrina Przyjemski - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 39:215-222.
Dependent Plural Pronouns with Skolemized Choice Functions.Yasutada Sudo - 2014 - Natural Language Semantics 22 (3):265-297.
Linguistic Control of Pronouns.Liliane Tasmowski-De Ryck & S. Paul Verluyten - 1982 - Journal of Semantics 1 (3-4):323-346.
Relational Nouns, Pronouns, and Resumption.Ash Asudeh - 2005 - Linguistics and Philosophy 28 (4):375 - 446.
Structured Contexts and Anaphoric Dependencies.Julie Hunter - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 168 (1):35-58.
Focusing Bound Pronouns.Clemens Mayr - 2012 - Natural Language Semantics 20 (3):299-348.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-05-05

Total views
222 ( #50,077 of 2,499,247 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #53,227 of 2,499,247 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes