E-Type Pronouns And E-Terms

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 16 (March):27-38 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Speaking of Professor Geach's belief that pronouns in natural language function like the bound variables in quantification theory, Gareth Evans, in ‘Pronouns, Quantifiers, and Relative Clauses - I’ says :I want to try to show that there are pronouns with quantifier antecedents that function in a quite different way. Such pronouns typically stand in a different grammatical relation to their antecedents, and; in contrast with bound pronouns, must be assigned a reference, so that their most immediate sentential contexts can always be assigned a truth value. The relevant grammatical relation appears to be Klima's relation of ‘in construction with’. When the pronoun is in construction with its antecedent, as in [‘Some man loves his mother’] and [‘No man is happy when he is in love’] the result is a bound pronoun.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-04

Downloads
37 (#420,900)

6 months
5 (#629,136)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Counterfactuals and Arbitrariness.Moritz Schulz - 2014 - Mind 123 (492):1021-1055.
The epsilon calculus' problematic.B. H. Slater - 1994 - Philosophical Papers 23 (3):217-242.
Quantifier/variable-binding.B. H. Slater - 2000 - Linguistics and Philosophy 23 (3):309-321.
A Poor Concept Script.Hartley Slater - 2004 - Australasian Journal of Logic 2:44-55.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references