Commentary: Mrs. J—Culture and Healthcare Ethics Committees

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19 (4):537-540 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The heart-rending story of Mrs. J raises many complex ethical issues. Key elements include suffering, disagreement, culture, religion, perspective, and facts. Overarching concerns include whose voices and stories should count, the connection of pain with suffering, and how healthcare ethics committees should respond

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Wisconsin Healthcare Ethics Committees.Robyn S. Shapiro, John P. Klein & Kristen A. Tym - 1997 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 6 (3):288.
Ethics Committees at Work.Patricia A. Marshall, Jay Hartz & S. Y. Tan - 1994 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 3 (1):135.
The Upper Limits of Pain and Suffering in Animal Research.Tom L. Beauchamp & David B. Morton - 2015 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 24 (4):431-447.
Ethics Committees at Work.Robert L. Schwartz & Marcy Luedtke - 1994 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 3 (2):270.
West Virginia Network of Ethics Committees.Alvin H. Moss - 1993 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2 (1):108.
Commentary: An Invitation to Cross-Cultural Conversation.Dan Bustillos - 2010 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19 (4):532-534.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
31 (#129,909)

6 months
31 (#500,116)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The future of bioethics.Howard Brody - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Enhancement Technologies and the Person: An Islamic View.Shahid Athar - 2008 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (1):59-64.

Add more references