Authors
Beckett Sterner
Arizona State University
Abstract
The growing range of methods for statistical model selection is inspiring new debates about how to handle the potential for conflicting results when different methods are applied to the same data. While many factors enter into choosing a model selection method, we focus on the implications of disagreements among scientists about whether, and in what sense, the true probability distribution is included in the candidate set of models. While this question can be addressed empirically, the data often provide inconclusive results in practice. In such cases, we argue that differences in prior metaphysical views about the local adequacy of the models can produce underdetermination of results, even for the same data and candidate models. As a result, data alone are sometimes insufficient to settle rational beliefs about nature.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/716243
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,066
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Statistical Model Selection Criteria and the Philosophical Problem of Underdetermination.I. A. Kieseppä - 2001 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (4):761-794.
Statistical Model Selection Criteria and the Philosophical Problem of Underdetermination.I. A. KieseppÄ - 2001 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (4):761-794.
Four Pillars of Statisticalism.Denis M. Walsh, André Ariew & Mohan Matthen - 2017 - Philosophy, Theory, and Practice in Biology 9 (1):1-18.
Selection and Causation.Mohan Matthen & André Ariew - 2009 - Philosophy of Science 76 (2):201-224.
Statistical Model Selection Criteria and Bayesianism.I. A. Kieseppä - 2001 - Philosophy of Science 68 (S3):S141-S152.
Statistical Model Selection Criteria and Bayesianism.I. A. Kieseppä - 2001 - Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2001 (3):S141 - S152.
What is Drift? A Response to Millstein, Skipper, and Dietrich.Mohan Matthen - 2010 - Philosophy, Theory, and Practice in Biology 2 (20130604).
Toward the Applicability of Statistics: A Representational View.Mahdi Ashoori & S. Mahmoud Taheri - 2019 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 23 (1):113-129.
Underdetermination and Models in Biology.Petr Jedlička - 2017 - Teorie Vědy / Theory of Science 39 (2):167-186.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-07-07

Total views
12 ( #805,890 of 2,498,775 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #210,759 of 2,498,775 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes