Against Adversarial Discussion

Collingwood and British Idealism Studies 22 (1):87-112 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Why did R.G. Collingwood come to reject the adversarial style of philosophical discussion so popular among his Oxford peers? The main aim of this paper is to explain that Collingwood came to reject his colleagues’ specific style of philosophical dialogue on methodological grounds, and to show how the argument against adversarial philosophical discussion is integrated with Collingwood’s overall criticism of realist philosophy. His argument exploits a connection between method and practice that should be taken seriously even today.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Shaping the Adversary Culture.Richard H. Gaskins - 2001 - Informal Logic 21 (2).
A Care-Based Model of the Physician-Patient Relationship.Jonathan M. Breslin - 2003 - Dissertation, Mcmaster University (Canada)
Stalky & co.: The adversarial curriculum.Jim Mackenzie - 2002 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 36 (4):609–620.
Should Europe worry about adversarial legalism?R. Kagan - 1997 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 17 (2):165-184.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-04-28

Downloads
1,454 (#7,432)

6 months
101 (#44,246)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Maarten Steenhagen
Clemencia Redmond Stichting

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references