Role of the UK Panel for Research Integrity in Health and Biomedical Science

Research Ethics 3 (3):71-72 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1177/174701610700300302

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Epistemic Integrity of Scientific Research.Jan Winter & Laszlo Kosolosky - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (3):757-774.
The Epistemic Integrity of Scientific Research.Jan De Winter & Laszlo Kosolosky - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (3):757-774.
Co-responsibility for research integrity.Carl Mitcham - 2003 - Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2):273-290.
The concept of risk and responsible conduct of research.Eugenijus Gefenas - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):75-83.
Changing explanatory frameworks in the U.S. government’s attempt to define research misconduct.David H. Guston - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):137-154.
The american experience: Lessons learned. [REVIEW]Lawrence J. Rhoades - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (1):95-107.
Trust and integrity in biomedical research: the case of financial conflicts of interest.Thomas H. Murray & Josephine Johnston (eds.) - 2010 - Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Respect for persons, respect for integrity: Remarks for the conceptualization of integrity in social ethics.Roger Fjellstrom - 2004 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 8 (2):231-242.
Boundary-Work in the Health Research Field: Biomedical and Clinician Scientists' Perceptions of Social Science Research. [REVIEW]Mathieu Albert, Suzanne Laberge & Brian D. Hodges - 2009 - Minerva 47 (2):171-194.
Innovation and integrity in biomedical research.Sheila Jasanoff - 2002 - In Ruth Ellen Bulger, Elizabeth Heitman & Stanley Joel Reiser (eds.), The ethical dimensions of the biological and health sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 68--71.
The role of scientific associations in promoting research integrity and deterring research misconduct: Commentary on ‘challenges in studying the effects of scientific societies on research integrity’.Melissa S. Anderson & Joseph B. Shultz - 2003 - Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2):269-272.
Conflicts between commercial and scientific roles in academic health research.Neetika Prabhakar Cox, Christopher Heaney & Robert M. Cook-Deegan - 2010 - In Thomas H. Murray & Josephine Johnston (eds.), Trust and integrity in biomedical research: the case of financial conflicts of interest. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Scientific societies and research integrity: What are they doing and how well are they doing it?Margot Iverson, Mark S. Frankel & Sanyin Siang - 2003 - Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2):141-158.
A review of the types of scientific misconduct in biomedical research. [REVIEW]Malhar N. Kumar - 2008 - Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (3):211-228.
Exploring the role of the research integrity officer: Commentary on ‘seven ways to plagiarize: Handling real allegations of research misconduct’.Lisa N. Geller - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (4):540-542.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-21

Downloads
2 (#1,808,280)

6 months
1 (#1,478,781)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references