Hume on luxury: a response to John Dennis?

History of Political Thought 20 (4):646-648 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Hume's essay ‘Of Luxury’ criticizes two extreme and contrasting doctrines: that luxury is always beneficial to society and that it is always baneful. Hume identifies the exponent of the first proposition as Bernard Mandeville in his book The Fable of the Bees, but does not name the second target of his essay. It is most probably John Dennis, one of Mandeville's contemporary critics. The evidence for this is that Hume challenges and contradicts three clearly defined theses advanced in Dennis's book Vice and Luxury Publick Mischiefs

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Mandeville against Luxury.Brandon P. Turner - 2016 - Political Theory 44 (1):26-52.
Hume's Nuanced Defense of Luxury.Ryu Susato - 2006 - Hume Studies 32 (1):167-186.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
26 (#599,290)

6 months
1 (#1,722,767)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references