Contradictions in British Vaccine Policy on Hepatitis B

History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 17 (1):113 - 122 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A vaccine for hepatitis B became available in the UK from 1982, but it did not solve the public health dilemmas presented by the disease. In the decade that followed, epidemiologically important groups such as intravenous drug users and gay men were not targetted, while the groups of health workers at the centre of policy concern received little vaccine. This paper draws on models of diffusion, the pattern of the disease, and previous policies on screening, to explain the restricted vaccine policy which was a field for contention through the 1980s and into the 1990s

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ethically compromised vaccines in Australia.Kerri Anne Brussen - 2012 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 17 (3):1.
Ethics and public health emergencies: Rationing vaccines.Matthew K. Wynia - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (6):4 – 7.
Strategies of Research For a Vaccine Against AIDS.Max Essex - 1995 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 17 (1):141 - 149.
The HPV vaccine controversy Where are the women? Where are the men? Where is the money?Jennifer Caseldine-Bracht - 2010 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 3 (1):99-112.
Male Infant Circumcision as a 'HIV Vaccine'.B. Lyons - 2013 - Public Health Ethics 6 (1):90-103.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-29

Downloads
15 (#942,606)

6 months
3 (#962,988)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references