Publication and Communication

In Ethics in the University. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley. pp. 155–175 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter contains sections titled: Introduction The Literature The Journals Data for Publication Peer Reviewers and Their Duties.

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

9781119346449   9781118872130

DOI

10.1002/9781119346449.ch7

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Referees, editors, and publication practices: Improving the reliability and usefulness of the Peer review system.Domenic V. Cicchetti - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):51-62.
Peer Review — An Insult to the Reader and to Society: Milton's View.Steven James Bartlett - 2017 - Willamette University Faculty Research Website.
Peer review and publication: Lessons for lawyers.Susan Haack - 2007 - Stetson Law Review 36 (3).
Peer-to-peer Review and the Future of Scholarly Authority.Kathleen Fitzpatrick - 2010 - Social Epistemology 24 (3):161-179.
The limited effectiveness of prestige as an intervention on the health of medical journal publications.Carole J. Lee - 2013 - Episteme 10 (4):387-402.
Peer Review and Quality Control in Science.Stephen Turner - 2007 - In G. Ritzer, J. M. Ryan & B. Thorn (eds.), The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology (1st Ed.). Wiley. pp. 3389-3391.
Peer review and the pillar of salt: a case study.James Lawrence Powell - 2023 - Research Ethics 19 (1):78-89.
Double Blind Peer-Review in Philosophies.Marcin J. Schroeder & Carla Aloè - 2021 - Philosophies 6 (2):36.
Peering, viewing and reviewing: What makes a Peer review good. Mohini & Sakir Ahmed - 2022 - Central Asian Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ethics 3 (2):119-124.
Review of the Ethics and Etiquettes of Time Management of Manuscript Peer Review. [REVIEW]Malhar N. Kumar - 2014 - Journal of Academic Ethics 12 (4):333-346.
Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again.Douglas P. Peters & Stephen J. Ceci - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):187-195.
Peer review and innovation.Raymond Spier - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (1):99-108.
Correction to: The changing forms and expectations of peer review.Willem Halffman & S. P. J. M. Horbach - 2018 - Research Integrity and Peer Review 3 (1).
A review on a peer review.Andrej Poleev - 2016 - Enzymes 14.
Social Media and the Politics of Small Data: Post Publication Peer Review and Academic Value.Lisa Blackman - 2016 - Theory, Culture and Society 33 (4):3-26.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-15

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references