Correction to: The changing forms and expectations of peer review

Research Integrity and Peer Review 3 (1) (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Following publication of this article [1] it was brought to our attention that we omitted to provide credit for Table 1. While the content of the table and the systematization of blinding in review have been referenced in the text as coming from [2], the credit line for Table 1 should have been added as follows: “Reproduced with permission from [2] licensed under a CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 License”. The original publication of this article has been corrected accordingly.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Correction to: Credal pragmatism.Jie Gao - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (6):1619-1619.
Correction to: A Bilingual, Bicultural Approach to Detachment and Appraisal in the Law: Tracing Impersonality and Interaction in English and Spanish Legal Op-Eds.María Ángeles Orts - 2018 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 31 (4):1013-1013.
Commensuration Bias in Peer Review.Carole J. Lee - 2015 - Philosophy of Science 82 (5):1272-1283,.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-02-03

Downloads
5 (#1,344,154)

6 months
1 (#1,040,386)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references