Direct Reference and Vague Identity

Philosophical Topics 28 (1):175--94 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Todd’s quip absurdly implies he knew that 30 carats is the threshold for vulgarity. But most philosophers think stopping here misses the root of the joke. They think there is a more fundamental absurdity; that it is even possible for a single carat to make the difference between a vulgar ring and a non-vulgar ring. We epistemicists defend the possibility.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
68 (#238,803)

6 months
6 (#509,130)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Roy Sorensen
University of Texas at Austin

Citations of this work

Many many problems.Brian Weatherson - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (213):481–501.
Vagueness in Geography.Achille C. Varzi - 2001 - Philosophy and Geography 4 (1):49–65.
Bivalence and what is said.Manuel García-Carpintero - 2007 - Dialectica 61 (1):167–190.
Truth-Bearers and Modesty.Manuel García-Carpintero - 2011 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 82 (1):49–75.
Vague Objects and Vague Identity: New Essays on Ontic Vagueness.K. Akiba (ed.) - 2014 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references