A Priori in the Classical Model of Science

Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 59 (1):81-93 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper is devoted to the concept of a priori and a priori knowledge within the framework of the classical model of science proposed for conducting research on the history of concepts, and in particular, the concept of “science” by digital humanities [de Jong, Betti, 2010]. In the first part of the article, I refer to the concept of model and (1) consider the classical model of science in terms of its heuristic potential for philosophical (and in particular, epistemological) research, and (2) define the main structural parts of the model for studying the concept a priori. In the second part, I consider the theoretical aspects of the classical model science in the context of a priori functional and historical concepts and the possibility of its adaptation to the analysis of the a priori in the history of science In the third part I propose a possible model for research of a priori in the classical model of science in two aspects: (1) a priori as universal principles underlying all sciences and (2) a priori as a set of propositions for a specific scientific discipline.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,897

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A priori and the Philosophy of Science. [REVIEW]Tatiana Sokolova - 2016 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 49 (3):225-231.
Armchair Science and Armchair Philosophy.Anton V. Kuznetsov - 2019 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 56 (2):43-45.
A Priori in the Philosophy of Science.Tatiana D. Sokolova - 2020 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 57 (3):60-74.
Does the a priori Belong to Science and Technology?Neb Kujundzic - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 64:51-59.
William Whewell’s philosophy of science and Immanuel Kant’s apriorism.Tatiana D. Sokolova - 2018 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 55 (2):180-185.
The Notion of a priori in Logical Empiricism and Its First Critics.Tatiana Sokolova - 2015 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 45 (3):80-97.
Kant's Philosophy of Science.Philip Kitcher - 1983 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 8 (1):387-407.
Armchair Philosophy.Timothy Williamson - 2019 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 56 (2):19 - 25.
On Gnoseological and Ontological Meaning of Thought Experiment.Igor Nevvazhay - 2016 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 49 (3):28-35.
Why so complicated?Tatiana Sokolova - 2017 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 52 (2):47-51.
The Nature of Scientific Philosophy.Yaroslav Shramko - forthcoming - Logic and Logical Philosophy:1.
Science and the Sciences in Plato. [REVIEW]Charles Griswold - 1982 - Review of Metaphysics 36 (2):441-442.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-03-16

Downloads
6 (#1,461,169)

6 months
4 (#790,394)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tatiana Sokolova
Russian Academy of Sciences

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references