Is the Australian HREC system sustainable — A rural perspective

Monash Bioethics Review 21 (3):S66-S67 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The scenario put forward by Dodds accurately reflects the current situation of the Australian HREC system and is difficult to take issue with. Those involved in providing input to HRECs continually confront the issues identified by the author. The increasing responsibility, the need for greater documentation, the increase in the range and complexity of applications, plus the increased ongoing surveillance of projects is placing an increased workload on HRECs. There are also some additional issues of relevance to HRECs operating in a rural environment.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,038

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Research governance: new hope for ethics committees?D. Frew & A. Martlew - 2007 - Monash Bioethics Review 26 (1-2):17-23.
Is the Australian HREC system unsustainable?J. A. Millar - 2002 - Monash Bioethics Review 21 (3):S63-S66.
Is the Australian HREC system sustainable?Susan Dodds - 2002 - Monash Bioethics Review 21 (3):S43-S48.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-02-03

Downloads
1 (#1,902,428)

6 months
1 (#1,473,890)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references