The Joke is the Thing: 'In the Company of Men' and the Ethics of Humor

Film and Philosophy 11:49-66 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Any analysis of "In the Company of Men" is forced to answer three questions of central importance to the ethics of humor: What does it mean to find sexist humor funny? What are the various sources of humor? And, can moral flaws with attempts at humor increase their humorousness? I argued that although merely finding a joke funny in a neutral context cannot tell you anything reliable about a person's beliefs, in context, a joke may reveal a great deal about one’s social attitudes, or feelings of insecurity. Especially in its portrayal of Howard, the film exposes the role of insecurity as a source of humor. Not only can insecurity make one more prone to laugh, but it can also make someone seem funnier in some contexts. I contended that this shows that a strong version of the superiority theory of humor is clearly wrong. Furthermore, the disparate audience reactions to Chad's jokes showed that the morally sensitive who were aware of the purpose of his jokes would see them as ethically flawed. Rather than making the jokes more amusing, the fact that the jokes were considered to be ethically flawed made them less funny. Hence, immoralism is most likely false

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Philosophy of humor.Joshua Shaw - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (2):112-126.
Just joking: The ethics and aesthetics of humor.Berys Nigel Gaut - 1998 - Philosophy and Literature 22 (1):51-68.
Truly funny: Humor, irony, and satire as moral criticism.E. M. Dadlez - 2011 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 45 (1):1-17.
The Importance of Humor in Teaching Philosophy.Al Gini - 2011 - Teaching Philosophy 34 (2):143-149.
Beyond a joke: the limits of humour.Sharon Lockyer & Michael Pickering (eds.) - 2005 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Humor.Aaron Smuts - 2006 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Do Moral Flaws Enhance Amusement?Aaron Smuts - 2009 - American Philosophical Quarterly 46 (2):151-163.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-12-01

Downloads
235 (#81,912)

6 months
12 (#174,629)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Aaron Smuts
Rhode Island College

Citations of this work

The Ethics of Humor: Can Your Sense of Humor be Wrong?Aaron Smuts - 2010 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (3):333-347.
Art and negative affect.Aaron Smuts - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (1):39-55.
Meriting a Response: The Paradox of Seductive Artworks.Nils-Hennes Stear - 2019 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 97 (3):465-482.
Winning Over the Audience: Trust and Humor in Stand‐Up Comedy.Daniel Abrahams - 2020 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 78 (4):491-500.
Is it Better to Love Better Things?Aaron Smuts - 2015 - In Tony Milligan, Christian Maurer & Kamila Pacovská (eds.), Love and Its Objects.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references