Reply to an Analytic Philosopher

South Atlantic Quarterly 101 (1):229-242 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I reply here to an article by philosopher Paul Boghossian in which my article "Cutting-Edge Equivocation: Conceptual Moves and Rhetorical Strategies in Contemporary Anti-Epistemology" (Smith, *SAQ* 2002) provides him with an occasion for a supposed exposure and refutation of the alleged illogic of the "unpalatable relativism" of what Boghossian, at some distance from his topic, (mis)understands as the "constructivism" of contemporary sociology of science.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

11 Wittgenstein: analytic philosopher?Anat Biletzki - 1998 - In Anat Biletzki & Anat Matar (eds.), The Story of Analytic Philosophy: Plot and Heroes. Routledge. pp. 197.
Reply to Barbara Herrnstein Smith.Seymour Chatman - 1981 - Critical Inquiry 7 (4):802-809.
Strawson and Kant.Hans-Johann Glock (ed.) - 2003 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Soames' History of Analytic Philosophy.Peter M. S. Hacker - 2006 - Philosophical Quarterly 56 (222):121-131.
Errata: A reply to Abbott.Roger Wertheimer - 1978 - Political Theory 6 (3):337-344.
Traditional vs. Analytic Philosophy. [REVIEW]Kevin Mulligan & Barry Smith - 1984 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 21 (1):193-202.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-11-23

Downloads
653 (#25,911)

6 months
110 (#38,719)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?