Philosophical Quarterly 56 (222):121-131 (2006)
AbstractThis critical review of Soames's history of analytic philosophy evaluates Soames's enterprise by reference to the degree to which it achieves his goals of (i) providing an overview of analytic philosophy 1900-75, (ii) explaining what the most important analytic philosophers thought, (iii) selecting some of the most important works of each philosopher for discussion, and (iv) properly evaluating the developments of the period. On all counts Soames's history is found sorely wanting. The overview it offers is riddled with distortion, its explanations are frequently mistaken and uncomprehending, its selection is demonstrably inadequate and its evaluations ill-informed and ill-judged
Similar books and articles
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Towards a Critical Philosophy of Science: Continental Beginnings and Bugbears, Whigs, and Waterbears.Babette Babich - 2010 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 24 (4):343-391.
Philosophy as Paradigms: An Account of a Contextual Metaphilosophical Perspective.Dimitris Gakis - 2016 - Philosophical Papers 45 (1-2):209-239.
Continental Philosophy of Science.Babette Babich - 2007 - In Constantin Boundas (ed.), The Edinburgh Companion to the Twentieth Century Philosophies. Edinburgh. University of Edinburgh Press. pp. 545--558.
Soames on ethics: A new vision for the future of analytic philosophy?Aaron Preston - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (5):1347-1355.
References found in this work
No references found.