On thinking about interpersonal violence and the impotence of force

South African Journal of Philosophy 42 (1):24-36 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX


We argue that the problem of violence persists, to a certain degree, because of our refusal or inability to think about traumatic, difficult or “senseless” material systematically. We explore the connection between thinking and violence, and specifically Arendt’s question whether thinking can make men abstain from violence. We are interested in the relationship and tension between knowing and not knowing – as products of thinking – in relation to (also our own capacities for) violence. The tension presents in two main ways. First, thinking is employed to shed light on dark or difficult knowable material, thereby increasing our understanding of ourselves, our place in a troubled society and our relation to violence. Second, thinking bumps up against our ability to know, and it is this unknowability that exposes us to our limits as thinking beings as well as a place of humility and mutual vulnerability. We suggest that paying closer and more nuanced attention to the gender dimensions of the above questions reveals something important about the reasons that gender-based violence persists. We argue, with Arendt, that violence results from non-mastery and that the equation of male power with violence is a lie that violence perpetuates about itself. Similarly, Heberle argues that violence results from the fragile non-cohesiveness of masculine subjectivity and thus also traces the roots of violence to weakness and fragility rather than strength or power. We argue that the antidote for this false mastery and control is thinking.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,347

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Interpersonal Violence and Public Policy: What about the Victims?Dean G. Kilpatrick - 2004 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 32 (1):73-81.
Interpersonal Violence and Public Policy: What about the Victims?Dean G. Kilpatrick - 2004 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 32 (1):73-81.
The practice of linguistic nonviolence.William C. Gay - 1998 - Peace Review 10 (4):545-547.
Violence.David Porchon & Ludovic Aubin - 2023 - In Nathanaël Wallenhorst & Christoph Wulf (eds.), Handbook of the Anthropocene. Springer. pp. 1559-1563.
On the Ontology of Violence.Sergii P. Shevtsov - 2022 - Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture 6 (4):48-62.
Interpersonal Opposition.Ilexa Yardley - 2022 - Https://Medium.Com/the-Circular-Theory/.
What are the costs of violence?Anke Hoeffler - 2017 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 16 (4):422-445.
Laclau’s Revolutionary Political Theology.Montserrat Herrero - 2020 - Síntesis Revista de Filosofía 2 (2):9-25.
Violence and Raciality: Toward an ‘Ethics With/out the Subject’.Mackenzie Smith - 2023 - Rhizomes: Cultural Studies in Emerging Knowledge 39.
The force of reason and the logic of force.Richard A. Lee - 2004 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.


Added to PP

14 (#996,159)

6 months
10 (#277,905)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Louise du Toit
University of Stellenbosch

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Sexual Contract.Carole Pateman - 1988 - Ethics 100 (3):658-669.
Feminist theory and Hannah Arendt's concept of public space.Seyla Benhabib - 1993 - History of the Human Sciences 6 (2):97-114.

Add more references