Intercourse and moral responsibility for the fetus

In William B. Bondesson, H. Tristram Englehardt, Stuart Spicker & Daniel H. Winship (eds.), Abortion and the Status of the Fetus. D. Reidel (1983)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

in Abortion and the Status of the Fetus, Volume XIII of the series, “Philosophy of Medicine,” eds. William B. Bondeson, H. Tristram Englehardt, Stuart Spicker, and Daniel H. Winship (Dordrecht, Holland/Boston, Massachusetts: D. Reidel, 1983), pp. 229-245.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Abortion: Models of responsibility. [REVIEW]Ann Garry - 1983 - Law and Philosophy 2 (3):371 - 396.
Conferred Rights and the Fetus.Ronald M. Green - 1974 - Journal of Religious Ethics 2 (1):55 - 75.
Was I ever a fetus?Eric T. Olson - 1997 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (1):95-110.
The Decision to Abort.Rebecca Hanrahan - 2007 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 21 (1):25-41.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
503 (#35,050)

6 months
67 (#62,860)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Holly Smith
Rutgers University - New Brunswick

Citations of this work

The Philosophy of sex: contemporary readings.Alan Soble (ed.) - 2002 - Totowa, N.J.: Rowman & Littlefield.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references