Neo-Anarchism or Neo-Liberalism? Yes, Please! A Response to Simon Critchley's Infinitely Demanding

Critical Horizons 10 (2):163-179 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Simon Critchley's Infinitely Demanding makes a timely contribution to contemporary debates in ethics and political philosophy. For all its originality, however, one can raise critical questions concerning Critchley's account of the forms of resistance possible within liberal democratic polities. In this article I question the adequacy of Critchley's ethically based neo-anarchism as a response to neo-liberalism, critically analysing the role of ideology in his account of the motivational deficit afflicting capitalist liberal democracies.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,991

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Comments on Simon Critchley’s Infinitely Demanding.Simon Critchley - 2008 - Symposium: Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy/Revue canadienne de philosophie continentale 12 (2):9-17.
Comments on Simon Critchley’s Infinitely Demanding.Alain Badiou & Simon Critchley - 2008 - Symposium: Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy/Revue canadienne de philosophie continentale 12 (2):9-17.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-09

Downloads
23 (#704,507)

6 months
6 (#588,740)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robert Sinnerbrink
Macquarie University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Parallax View.Slavoj Žižek - 2004 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 8 (2):255-269.

View all 7 references / Add more references