On the Assertion of Philosophical Doubt

Dialogue 10 (1):82-91 (1971)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Familiar arguments against scepticism are explicated in terms of a distinction between logical possibility and assertibility. Certain consistent sceptical propositions are unassertible.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,846

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Cynical Assertion: Convention, Pragmatics, and Saying "Uncle".Tim Kenyon - 2003 - American Philosophical Quarterly 40 (3):241-248.
The Early Wittgenstein on Logical Assertion.Ian Proops - 1997 - Philosophical Topics 25 (2):121-144.
Polanyi and Wittgenstein on Doubt.Yu Zhenhua - 2012 - International Philosophical Quarterly 52 (4):439-453.
Dubious assertions.David Sosa - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 146 (2):269 - 272.
Knowledge and suberogatory assertion.John Turri - 2013 - Philosophical Studies (3):1-11.
The Supportive Reasons Norm of Assertion.Rachel McKinnon - 2013 - American Philosophical Quarterly 50 (2):121-135.
Assertion and isolated second-hand knowledge.Jennifer Lackey - 2011 - In Jessica Brown & Herman Cappelen (eds.), Assertion: New Philosophical Essays. Oxford University Press. pp. 251--276.
Against Assertion.Herman Cappelen - 2011 - In Jessica Brown & Herman Cappelen (eds.), Assertion: New Philosophical Essays. Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-25

Downloads
13 (#1,035,489)

6 months
1 (#1,469,946)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Evan Simpson
Memorial University of Newfoundland

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Moore's Modal Argument.R. L. Purtill - 1966 - American Philosophical Quarterly 3 (3):236 - 243.

Add more references