On a nominalistic analysis of non-extensional contexts

Logique Et Analyse 59 (60):496 (1972)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

A reply to T.M. Simpson.J. Cohen - 1975 - Logique Et Analyse 18 (69):209.
Parconsistent extensional propositional logics.D. Batens - 1980 - Logique Et Analyse 23 (90):1952.
Conceptual Analysis of Causation and Theoretical Utility in Everyday Contexts.Erik Weber & Leen Vreese - 2009 - Logique Et Analyse 52.
The Extensional Classification Of Categorical Propositions And Trivalent Logic.Klixbull Jorgensen - 1967 - Logique Et Analyse 10 (June):141-156.
O'Carroll M. J.. Improper self-reference in classical logic and the prediction paradox. Logique et analyse, n.s. vol. 10 , pp. 167–172.O'Carroll M. J.. A three-valued, non-levelled logic consistent for all self-reference. Logique et analyse, n.s. vol. 10 , pp. 173–178. [REVIEW]James Cargile - 1972 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 37 (2):422-423.
Paraconsistent extensional propositional logics.Diderik Batens - 1980 - Logique and Analyse 90 (90):195-234.
Is Non-Reductive Conceptual Analysis a Meta-Philosophical Problem for Theories of Causation?Alexander Reutlinger - 2011 - Logique Et Analyse 54 (216).
Quantification into epistemic contexts.R. A. Girle - 1974 - Logique Et Analyse 17 (65):127.
M. J. Cresswell. The completeness of S0.5. Logique et analyse, n.s. vol. 9 , pp. 263–266. - Richard Routley. The decidability and semantical incompleteness of Lemmon's system S0.5. Logique et analyse, vol. 11 , pp. 413–421. - M. J. Cresswell. Note on the interpretation of SO.5. Logique et analyse, vol. 13 , pp. 376–378. - M. K. Rennie. Remark on Cresswell on S0.5. Logique et analyse, vol. 14 , pp. 757–758. [REVIEW]G. F. Schumm - 1973 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 38 (2):328-329.
Forme logique et forme sémantique: un argument contre M. Geach.Pieter Am Seuren - 1977 - Logique Et Analyse 79 (20):338-47.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-11

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references