What makes a strong argument? Emotions, highly-placed values, and role-playing

Communication and Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly Journal (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,571

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Levels of emotion and levels of consciousness.Carroll Izard - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):96-98.
Two Arguments Against the Cognitivist Theory of Emotions.John-Michael Kuczynski - 2004 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 11 (2):65-72.
An Ethics Role-Playing Case.Tim Manuel - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics Education 7:141-154.
Emotional reason how to deliberate about value.Bennett W. Helm - 2000 - American Philosophical Quarterly 37 (1):1-22.
Emozioni, giudizi e valori.Marianna Ganapini - 2008 - Aisthesis: Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi Dell’Estetico 1 (1).

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-05

Downloads
25 (#628,404)

6 months
2 (#1,192,610)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Rhetorical Theory of Argument is Self-Defeating.Scott F. Aikin - 2011 - Cogency: Journal of Reasoning and Argumentation 3 (1).

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references