Mysticism and scientific naturalism

Sophia 43 (1):83-99 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX


How, from a scientific standpoint, should we understand mystical experiences? On the one hand such experiences are obviously capable of being studied scientifically. Nevertheless there is a sense in which such experiences often seem strongly opposed to our ordinary scientific views of reality, for they often seem to point to a domain quite outside that examined by naturalistic empirical science. Indeed, this is often precisely what seems to be ‘mystical’ about them. The present essay takes a hard look at specific question of the possible significance of these experiences for scientific naturalism.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 78,094

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Mysticism, Freudianism, and Scientific Psychology.Knight Dunlap - 1920 - Freeport, N.Y., Books for Libraries Press.
Levin and Ghins on the “no miracle” argument and naturalism.Mario Alai - 2012 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2 (1):85-110.
Can science explain mysticism?Evan Fales - 1999 - Religious Studies 35 (2):213-227.
Introduction - the nature of naturalism.David Macarthur & Mario De Caro - 2004 - In Mario De Caro & David Macarthur (eds.), Naturalism in Question. Harvard University Press. pp. 1-20.


Added to PP

63 (#195,792)

6 months
1 (#489,169)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jonathan Shear
Virginia Commonwealth University

References found in this work

Add more references