The Infinite Circle

The Owl of Minerva 20 (2):165-182 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article explores a rarely acknowledged and all too often specifically denied possibility: the relevance of Hegel’s philosophy to the interpretation of the literary work of Hermann Hesse. Contemporary Hesse scholars critical of this position, such as Edmund Gnefkow, Martin Pfeifer, and Mark Boulby, tend to view Hegel primarily as a rigorously rationalist philosopher of history. Thus they perpetuate a myth which has long been abandoned by the mainstream of Hegelian scholarship and should have been permanently laid to rest by Iwan Iljin in Die Philosophie Hegels als kontemplative Gotteslehre when he presented convincing evidence for considering Hegel as an “intuitively-rational clairvoyant”.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Infinite Circle.Ingrid H. Shafer - 1989 - The Owl of Minerva 20 (2):165-182.
Die Bestimmung der Mathematik bei Cusanus und Leibniz.Ulli Roth - 1997 - Studia Leibnitiana 29 (1):63-80.
Life and Infinity.NuyGnues Eel - 2014 - Dissertation,
Unendlichkeit: Von Cusanus zu Hegel.Claus-Artur Scheier - 2007 - In Klaus Reinhardt & Harald Schwaetzer (eds.), Nicolaus Cusanus Und der Deutsche Idealismus. S. Roderer-Verlag. pp. 25--9.
Hegel, Kolb, and Flay: Foundationalism or Anti-Foundationalism?James P. Kow - 1993 - International Philosophical Quarterly 33 (2):203-218.
Hegel’s Concept of The True Infinite.Robert R. Williams - 2010 - The Owl of Minerva 42 (1-2):89-122.
Solger and Hegel: Negation and Privation.Paolo Diego Bubbio - 2009 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (2):173-187.
Hegel’s Concept of The True Infinite.Robert R. Williams - 2010 - The Owl of Minerva 42 (1/2):89-122.
A criticism of Shmuel Hugo Bergman's account of Nicolaus cusanus.Joseph Horovitz - 1986 - In Abraham Zvie Bar-On (ed.), Grazer Philosophische Studien. Distributed in the U.S.A. By Humanities Press. pp. 95-113.
A Criticism of Shmuel Hugo Bergman's Account of Nicolaus Cusanus.Joseph Horovitz - 1985 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 24 (1):95-113.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-15

Downloads
5 (#1,535,575)

6 months
3 (#962,988)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references