Ethics and Information Technology 23 (3):331-343 (2021)

Authors
Tamar Sharon
Radboud University Nijmegen
Abstract
Societies evolve practices that reflect social norms of appropriateness in social interaction, for example when and to what extent one should respect the boundaries of another person’s private sphere. One such practice is what the sociologist Erving Goffman called civil inattention—the social norm of showing a proper amount of indifference to others—which functions as an almost unnoticed yet highly potent privacy-preserving mechanism. These practices can be disrupted by technologies that afford new forms of intrusions. In this paper, we show how new networked technologies, such as facial recognition, challenge our ability to practice civil inattention. We argue for the need to revitalise, in academic and policy debates, the role of civil inattention and related practices in regulating behaviour in public space. Our analysis highlights the relational nature of privacy and the importance of social norms in accomplishing and preserving it. While our analysis goes some way in supporting current calls to ban FR technology, we also suggest that, pending a ban and in light of the power of norms to limit what is otherwise technically possible, cultivating new practices of civil inattention may help address the challenges raised by FR and other forms of digital surveillance in public.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10676-020-09575-7
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,959
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Toward a Feminist Theory of the State.Catharine A. Mackinnon - 1991 - Law and Philosophy 10 (4):447-452.
The Arcades Project.Walter Benjamin, Howard Eiland & Kevin Mclaughlin - 1999 - Science and Society 65 (2):243-246.
Concealment and Exposure.Thomas Nagel - 1998 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 27 (1):3-30.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

On Doing Being a Stranger: The Practical Constitution of Civil Inattention.Stefan Hirschauer - 2005 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 35 (1):41–67.
Contingency Inattention: Against Causal Debunking in Ethics.Regina Rini - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (2):369-389.
In the Privacy of Our Streets.Carissa Véliz - 2018 - In Bryce Newell, Tjerk Timan & Bert-Jaap Koops (eds.), Surveillance, Privacy and Public Space. pp. 16-32.
Privacy and Policy for Genetic Research.Judith Wagner DeCew - 2004 - Ethics and Information Technology 6 (1):5-14.
Civil Disobedience in a Distorted Public Sphere.Martin Blaakman - 2012 - Krisis: Journal for Contemporary Philosophy (3):27-36.
Privacy.Edmund Byrne - 1998 - In Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics. San Diego: Academic Press. pp. 649-659.
Privacy and the Public/Private Dichotomy.Simon Dawes - 2011 - Thesis Eleven 107 (1):115-124.
Privacy and Social Interaction.Beate Roessler & Dorota Mokrosinska - 2013 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 39 (8):771-791.
On Hart's Ways : Law as Reason and as Fact.John Finnis - 2008 - In Matthew H. Kramer (ed.), American Journal of Jurisprudence. Oxford University Press. pp. 25-53.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-01-17

Total views
15 ( #697,308 of 2,504,597 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #277,254 of 2,504,597 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes