The effects of contrast upon compliance with socially undesirable requests in the foot-in-the-door paradigm

&
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 20 (3):180-182 (1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.3758/bf03334809

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,532

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The effects of delay upon compliance with socially undesirable requests in the door-in-the-face paradigm.Mitri E. Shanab & Steven A. Isonio - 1980 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 15 (2):76-78.
The effects of self-perception and perceptual contrast upon compliance with socially undesirable requests.Mitri E. Shanab & Pamela J. O’Neill - 1982 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 19 (5):279-281.
The “foot-in-the-door” phenomenon: Mediating effects of size of first request and sex of requester.Robert A. Baron - 1973 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 2 (2):113-114.
Effects of positive and negative requests on compliance following transgression.David L. Mcmillen, Jerry A. Jackson & James B. Austin - 1974 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 3 (1):80-82.
Do Ethics Matter? Tax Compliance and Morality.James Alm & Benno Torgler - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 101 (4):635-651.
Contrast effects as a function of shifts in delay of water reward.Hugh J. Ferrell & Mitri E. Shanab - 1975 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 5 (5):417-420.
Positive and negative contrast effects obtained following shifts in delayed water reward.Mitri E. Shanab & Robert E. Spencer - 1978 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 12 (3):199-202.
Contrast effects as a function of delay and shifts in magnitude of water reward in thirsty rats.Robert E. Spencer & Mitri E. Shanab - 1979 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 13 (2):93-96.
Adherence, shared decision-making and patient autonomy.Lars Sandman, Bradi B. Granger, Inger Ekman & Christian Munthe - 2012 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (2):115-127.
Primate handedness: A foot in the door.Peter F. MacNeilage, Michael G. Studdert-Kennedy & Bjorn Lindblom - 1988 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11 (4):737-746.
The effect of interpolated time intervals upon the contrast effects.M. G. Preston - 1936 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 19 (6):706.
Corporate Social Responsibility in Global Value Chains: Where Are We Now and Where Are We Going?Peter Lund-Thomsen & Adam Lindgreen - 2014 - Journal of Business Ethics 123 (1):11-22.
Caring for “Socially Undesirable” Patients.Nancy S. Jecker - 1996 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 5 (4):500.
The Effect of Friendly Persuasion and Gender on Tax Compliance Behavior.Janne Chung & Viswanath Umashanker Trivedi - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 47 (2):133 - 145.
Different Perspectives on Cross-Compliance.Stefan Mann - 2005 - Environmental Values 14 (4):471 - 482.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-22

Downloads
15 (#939,976)

6 months
1 (#1,470,413)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references