Evil Demon Hypothesis and Its Position in Descartes' System of Thought

Journal of Philosophical Investigations at University of Tabriz 7 (13):47-68 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the First Meditation, Descartes declares some doubts about everything that can be called into doubt. And in the other five meditations, he, by removing all of these doubts, tries to show, in spite of excessive doubts, that it is possible to reach certain knowledge. In other words, Descartes here decides to overcome completely doubt by doubt itself. The main question, to which the authors of this article are going to reply, is that whether or not, this decision has been carried out in the remainder of Meditations. A chain of doubts has been put forward in First Meditation of which the last is evil demon hypothesis. The writers believe that this last and actually the most hyperbolical doubt has not been removed nowhere by Descartes, either in Meditations or in his Replies to Objections, or in other writings. Although it is through this doubt that the project of calling everything into doubt can be worked out, it seems, after First Meditation, that the position and role of evil demon hypothesis has been forgotten or wittingly neglected, in Descartes' philosophy.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-11-10

Downloads
15 (#976,359)

6 months
1 (#1,516,603)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references