Science and Engineering Ethics 27 (6):1-9 (2021)

Authors
David M. Shaw
University of Basel
Abstract
In this article we summarise some previously described proposals for ethical governance of autonomous vehicles, critique them, and offer an alternative solution. Rather than programming cars to react to crash situations in the same way as humans, having humans program pre-set responses for a wide range of different potential scenarios, or applying particular ethical theories, we suggest that decisions should be made jointly between humans and cars. Given that humans lack the requisite processing capacity, and computers lack the necessary ethical capacity, the medical paradigm of advance care planning can be retooled for this new context. Advance car-crash planning provides a way to combine humans’ ethical preferences with the advanced data processing capacities of computers to enable shared decision making in collision situations.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11948-021-00358-x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,079
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

A Rawlsian Algorithm for Autonomous Vehicles.Derek Leben - 2017 - Ethics and Information Technology 19 (2):107-115.
A Defence of the Control Principle.Martin Sand - 2020 - Philosophia 49 (2):765-775.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Shared Decision-Making, Gender and New Technologies.Kristin Zeiler - 2007 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 10 (3):279-287.
Irresponsibilities, Inequalities and Injustice for Autonomous Vehicles.Hin-Yan Liu - 2017 - Ethics and Information Technology 19 (3):193-207.
Who is the Patient? Tensions Between Advance Care Planning and Shared Decision‐Making.Kerstin Knight - 2019 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 25 (6):1217-1225.
Shared Decision-Making and Patient Autonomy.Lars Sandman & Christian Munthe - 2009 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (4):289-310.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-12-15

Total views
5 ( #1,203,194 of 2,506,109 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #139,897 of 2,506,109 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes